We all know "identity" is packed full of problems. But there is a root problem affecting the structure of all civil identifiers: Accuracy.
People are gravitating to self-Sovereign ID for a reason.. the root problem is pointed at directly in the name.
No system can survive inaccuracy, and worse, in the absence of accuracy, the generative model of participation affecting personal data correlated to civil identifiers makes us all inferior to what should be a common sense understanding of people in a civil system.
Of course, its not common sense. People make slaves of themselves repeatedly..
When I spent years pointing at the root problem of inaccurate "Sovereign source authority" due to a flawed model of administration in the order of operations instantiating data and Rights under civil laws... "crazy" was the baseline response.. my wiki entry was denied as fanciful with a "Good luck with that" response. That it was jumped on as a market naming convention for an object that originates outside of civil databases and holds the data model of civil Society accountable to people, rather than admin systems, is a function of how desperate the market is to fix something fundamentally broken.
ID pros have good intentions and a ton of effort at their backs, but like NSTIC, if the order of operations is backwards, the effort is DOA.
I personally have no intent to brand an ID product with this naming convention... but I sure will be pointing out where the root authority is derived from in the admin process standing up an ID product.
I am not the dog of my Government.. my Government is my dog in America... and if it wants to get back to acting like man's best friend, it needs to fix its root problem... mis-structured administrative order of operations in the origination of civil identifiers used to stand up civil participation and authority within a jurisdiction with meaningful civil laws and human Rights.
The name is fit for purpose... the evolution of literacy in our Society needs to pick up pace and commit to functional outcomes and structural models of participation. Lawyers should be leading this charge.. but thinking backwards is a problem in this profession.
Get it straight... Relationship Structures Matter.
Get it straight... Relationship Structures Matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment