1. Database model - data plantation based on possession of ID assets structured as liabilities
2. Self-Sovereign model - root authority at edges, admin verification mechanism at center.
In order for #2 to live in the world, a recursive signatory from one generation to the next authenticating the structural model of participation and Rights is required.
In America, John Hancock serves as our muse when considering the structure of Sovereign authority and the ID/signatory of participation within civil Society. The source of authority demonstrated by John Hancock and his peers in signing the "Declaration of Independence" had a personal origin. These people all put their personal lives, security, fortunes and reputations on the line, literally, and there was no authentication system in place when they did so. In essence, they used a personal relationship network to validate their own personal Sovereign source authority to declare anything meaningful in nascent Sovereign Terms.
You, as an American citizen, are no less than these people. Unless, of course, you Agree to participate in an ID/signatory based system of Rights without holding the system accountable to enforce your own participatory authority.
American Rights do not resolve from a database or State Trust storing birth certificates. American Rights are for, by, of people, not birth certificates. Of course, in administrative practice, try exercising your personal Rights without these administrative documents, including passports, driver's licenses, social security numbers, etc... which all originate and resolve to an administrative source of authority.
If you are provisioned authority to act as an American citizen, are you actually an American? Structure yields results in such concerns, and every person who has ever started a corporation and taken responsibility to protect the "corporate veil" from being compromised understands the importance of structural integrity. Unfortunately, the average American citizen does not, and the process of demonstrating America's model of authority is not something that is taught in public schools, funded by American tax payers.
American authority originates in people, Individuals all. This is not an optional requirement. Any other structural model is literally "un-American", and out of step with Constitutional integrity. Do law schools understand this?
A recursive signatory serves as the foundation of American ID within all Government-supported administration methods, such that the originating act of "Declaring Independence" is conveyed to every person, every Individual citizen, in the same manner as the founders demonstrated personally.
The founders of America did not demonstrate one model of American Sovereignty, and then convey a data plantation to everyone else to comply with. Instead, one generation after the next is required to protect the very Institution derived "of, by, for" people, Individuals all, by way of the structural process of inaugurating authentic participation.
Americans give their personal authority to their Governance. Americans do not receive their authority from their Government. The American people are not the dog of their government, because structurally, the Government is guaranteed to operate as the best friend of the people, Individuals all. This structural process, putting the authority of people before the authority of a bureaucratic Institution is the literal structural integrity differentiating THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA from every other Nation on Earth.
Generation after generation since America's founding has had their personal Sovereign source authority squandered and mis-represented by an "error of omission" from the structural process of forming an identity with recursive signatory integrity in the administration of American Rights.
This order of operations failure, putting a false model of administrative precedence within a database, is of utmost importance to how American Rights are administered. Without an accurate administrative precedence belonging to people, Individuals all, the Government becomes the keeper of people, rather than people being the keeper of their Governance.
For some reason, this is not obvious. For some reason, lawyers get this wrong constantly. The concept of a recursive signatory tied to Rights administration exceeds the intellectual grasp of legal managers living on the data plantation they have derived their administrative methods from. This must be repaired, for a Government derived "of, by, for" people, Individuals All.. can not exist otherwise.
America can not exist in practice without a recursive signatory event tied to Rights administration for every American citizen, giving form and function to the self-Sovereign method of Rights administration that gave life to America, and sustains it to this day.
Recursive defined in context: "An act that repeats .. from generation to generation, person to person .. instantiating precise meaning recursively, without deprecation to sub-process or admin-defined meaning not wholly accurate in original act." ~ https://twitter.com/NZN/status/1410647121594826756
ReplyDeleteCS derived example of recursion: https://pythonmini.app.oyoclass.com/file/57484f15f3c5120b6fa87288
ReplyDeleteEffective use of AI by people requires structural integrity... at the data layer of participation, where people, Individuals all, own root authority and opportunity derived by use, rather than as business model data-slaves in a race to the bottom on the Facebook/Meta or Google data-ship leveraging that default status by poorly secured civil participants freely exploited for profit by selling of context-based value to customers of slave-data-labor by "users" of civil society, rather than its root custodians and Rights-bearing masters for whom civil society exists, and all its tools and methods therein, as Individual people in pursuit of happiness, with liberty and life, at the bleeding edge of existence..
ReplyDelete