The Human mind has limits; it improves in time...
In any sentient ecology.. to take the broadest scope.. Individuals exist among one another...
Capability and compliance are sisters on a see-saw.. what is the transaction value?
"FREE" needs to grow up.. and I say that with deep respect for zero-cost.
"Free with Civil Rights", in America, as a conceptual necessity more so than enforcement mechanism, was set at $20, in 1789 money.
The concept, as I understand it, was a method of dealing with triviality. You have a Right to accountability among a jury of your peers in any transaction with others greater than $20 in exchange. "Trivial" uses of our civil infrastructure represented an attack against our civil infrastructure.
How do "We" people interpret that today?
Not very well. Functional literacy in the average populous is ridiculously low, by comparison to technical complexity affecting interpretation of reality. If you can not understand what is happening to you by use of the devices computationally managing your existence, you are not a functionally literate human being.
Functional literacy was not a requirement for Constitutional protection, but it sure behaves differently in this "thing" we call a marketplace + litigation space on the internet.
I find it ironic, at least here in America, that "We" have an inability to function with self-Sovereign data integrity and demonstrable Rights in any legal marketplace/ litigation space as a human with Constitutional protection over our civil Rights as the primary organizing constraint, as well as the accurate definition of "asset" and "liability" in the origin of authority and its structure in ALL legal ID REQUIREMENTS.
I am of the opinion, as an extremely entrepreneurial thinker who loves the free market, that the civil infrastructure of my Sovereign legal affiliation as citizen MUST validate self-Sovereign ID Rights and data structure at root citizenship, for its families and babies, or it risks collapse. The absence of functional Law, like the absence of functional literacy, is an outcome produced by systems no longer holding accurate constraints for legal participation. We see it everywhere.
The internet was a work product of the Department of Defense, in its Research projects Planning Agency, and it was intended to do what it has done, break down communication silos. The silos are not bound by time or geography to obey the understanding of linear history, or what linear time has brought to our varying societies. People, Individuals all, are the ultimate silo. Breaking our communication silo starts at identification, in every way possible. You are the ultimate prize. At scale, you rule the world.
Complexity is the enemy of progress. Self-Sovereign Human Rights is a mouthful. If an Individual baby does not stand up their own legal participation in civil Society, relative to time, what the heck are any of us doing living on a planet with such little respect for the actual human condition? Failure is failure. Charity is charity. Functional performance is functional performance.
Seriously... fighting the good fight requires us to fix some things. A paradigm shift has taken place. It already happened. Babies are at risk; their structure as data is at risk of exploitation. Their parents do not know how to protect them. They do not know how to protect and empower themselves. Their "OPEN" and "FREE" exploitation is enforced by a system functioning at the level of a Terms of Service document.
Who fixes that? Harvard Law sure has played a leading role in advancing the American Constitutional model.. putting this conversational space here makes sense, and thanks to Doc, this conversational space has amplified some of these ideas. Customering comes after self-Sovereign origins of authority are established, because functioning in the marketplace is protected by Sovereign law. In America, self-Sovereign origins of authority are not optional. In fact, it is my position that failure/success to construct the legal integrity of America in this new space is based on one accurate definition of how American Sovereign authority is constructed and represented in the future.
We are an experiment gone awry, and our Rights model is THE Rights model that the entire world depends on to counter-balance its opposite... simply stated, that "You" get "Your Rights" from the "Government" and their operational format is not under your control or authority. You are provisioned Sovereign Rights under the law. China, Russia, dictators love this model. Your Sovereignty belongs to a Civilization, to a King, to the one true power... AND NOT YOU. America does it different, or its doesn't exist. The "American Dream" was the market model of the American Constitutional model of authority. "You" can make it here. You and "You" require a self-Sovereign ID that matches your human authority in origin, under Constitutional Law. Government methods need to respect and enforce this Rights model. Freedom is accountability, bi-directional exchanges.
America is the Human Rights model that protects the Individual Rights of Human beings to enforce their own Sovereign will, given to them by their Creator, in order to directly pursue life, liberty and happiness. Families of Individuals, strung together through time, picking up the slack when orphans need a hand and heart. This is our American Constitutional model.
Its failing.
I believe "We" need to fail forward... self-Sovereign ID is the origin of Human authority... it is real in the physical world, or America doesn't exist.. blockchain technology holds promise of empowering it in digital transactions.. their existence is real, required and in real jeopardy on the internet, and under the law due to mal-practice in its truest form. Broken law is bad law.
No comments:
Post a Comment