Self-Sovereignty, and its structure as ID, is a pre-market conceptualization of people as source of all Sovereign integrity. Human Rights, if not structurally supported, and if not respected in baseline methods of administering a civil Society, do not exist...no matter how many high-minded pieces of paper you write upon.
Ownership of property *should be* a downstream consideration upon a foundation of self-Sovereign human authority. If laws are respectful of this structural definition of Human Rights, and their baseline application to the definition of "Civil Society", then the uses of data I/We are fighting against in the conceptualization of data as property *should* already stand out as derogatory if not illegal.
That said, civil Society is backing its way into a functional definition of itself. I don't think this fight is really a productive fight, to the extent the mass public is involved. Getting people to think as something other than mere dependents is hard enough. Citizen customers are already an obstacle to a functional civil Society.
Operationalizing my own Rights as a human participating in a market is a varied experience taking many forms...and at the base of my self-Sovereign authority is the choice to own my own fruit... to own my own root participatory choices and their outcomes.
Fighting against "property" is not productive. Advocating for functional Human Rights needs to be productive.
Modern Human Rights are a laughing stock in action, and thats a structural outcome.
Source Commentary
Source Commentary
No comments:
Post a Comment